<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Philosophy Department Faculty Publications</title>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2013 Providence College All rights reserved.</copyright>
<link>http://digitalcommons.providence.edu/philosophy_fac</link>
<description>Recent documents in Philosophy Department Faculty Publications</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 01:05:19 PST</lastBuildDate>
<ttl>3600</ttl>








<item>
<title>Simone Weil&apos;s Spiritual Critique of Modern Science: An Historical-Critical Assessment</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.providence.edu/philosophy_fac/7</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.providence.edu/philosophy_fac/7</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 13:36:33 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This paper evaluates Simone Weil's philosophy and theology of science from the perspective of an historical phenomenology of science.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Joseph K. Cosgrove</author>


<category>Philosophy</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Cartesian Certainty and the Infinity of the Will</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.providence.edu/philosophy_fac/6</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.providence.edu/philosophy_fac/6</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 08:53:37 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This paper interprets Descartes' conception of "certainty" as most fundamentally a function of the human will, controlling the cognitive encounter with the world.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Joseph K. Cosgrove</author>


<category>Philosophy</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Husserl, Jacob Klein, and Symbolic Nature</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.providence.edu/philosophy_fac/5</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.providence.edu/philosophy_fac/5</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:04:23 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This paper examines Husserl's later philosophy of science in light of Jacob Klein's work in the history of mathematics and in the context of 20th-century "spacetime" physics.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Joseph K. Cosgrove</author>


<category>Philosophy</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>On the Mathematical Representation of Spacetime: A Case Study in Bewitchment by Algebra</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.providence.edu/philosophy_fac/4</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.providence.edu/philosophy_fac/4</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 13:19:51 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>This paper argues that the concept of “Minkowski spacetime” (specifically, the so-called “spacetime interval”) is a physically incoherent, notational artifact of the symbolic method of representation employed in mathematical physics.  I show that the concept of Minkowski spacetime, generalized in general relativity as a “semi-Riemannian manifold,” is unnecessary to the formulation of Einstein’s general theory of relativity, and that therefore, the aforementioned notion of “spacetime” should be discarded as a concept of mathematical <em>physics</em>, as it does not and cannot give a true description of the physical world.  It follows that spacetime physics can provide no support for the philosophical concept of so-called “block time” or “eternalism.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Joseph K. Cosgrove</author>


<category>Philosophy</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>Principles and Paradoxes of International Law</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.providence.edu/philosophy_fac/3</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.providence.edu/philosophy_fac/3</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 07:39:26 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Phillip E. Devine</author>


<category>Philosophy</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>The Search for Moral Absolutes</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.providence.edu/philosophy_fac/2</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.providence.edu/philosophy_fac/2</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 11:50:17 PST</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	
	]]>
</description>

<author>Philip E. Devine</author>


<category>Philosophy</category>

</item>






<item>
<title>The New Fuzziness: Richard Rorty on Education</title>
<link>http://digitalcommons.providence.edu/philosophy_fac/1</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://digitalcommons.providence.edu/philosophy_fac/1</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:07:35 PDT</pubDate>
<description>
	<![CDATA[
	<p>The New Fuzziness: Richard Rorty and Education is an examination of the works of Richard Rorty, focusing on his impact on education. Richard Rorty is "one of the most provocative and influential of contemporary thinkers writing in English." This unpublished manuscript is written by Dr. Philip E. Devine, Professor of Philosophy at Providence College.</p>

	]]>
</description>

<author>Phillip E. Devine</author>


<category>Philosophy</category>

</item>





</channel>
</rss>
